Ft. Worth PD Willing to Violate Your Right To Carry

One of the changes that we are working on in the legislature is a clarification of Texas Penal Code 42.01(a)(8).

Sec. 42.01. DISORDERLY CONDUCT. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:
(1) uses abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language in a public place, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(2) makes an offensive gesture or display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(3) creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place;
(4) abuses or threatens a person in a public place in an obviously offensive manner;
(5) makes unreasonable noise in a public place other than a sport shooting range, as defined by Section 250.001, Local Government Code, or in or near a private residence that he has no right to occupy;
(6) fights with another in a public place;
(7) discharges a firearm in a public place other than a public road or a sport shooting range, as defined by Section 250.001, Local Government Code;
(8) displays a firearm or other deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to alarm

While intelligent people understand what paragraph (8) means, our law enforcement personnel seem to think it’s up to interpretation. The code does NOT say “displays a firearm or other deadly weapon in a public place and it alarms people.” It says that such such display must be “calculated to cause alarm.” Our mission statement is very clear on our purpose and intent for engaging in these open carry events: to educate and raise awareness. Just because some is “alarmed” doesn’t mean that something was actually alarming. It’s no different that someone claiming to be offended when the action wasn’t necessarily offended.

However, Fort Worth Police Department has taken on the stance that if just ONE person calls in and complains or says that they were “alarmed” members of our group could be arrested for Disorderly Conduct. In other words, FWPD thinks what the individual bias on ONE individual trumps the rights of the entire state population. Their belief is that gun owners are expected to know the thoughts of every single person in society and whether or not they are afraid of guns.

In a recent exchange with FWPD Sergeant Keith McGuire – who is NOT a spokesperson for the department – he tells Open Carry Texas that “as long as you are not pointing the rifle in anyone’s direction (which is almost impossible in a public street) you are not really supposed to be arrested.”

Whatever happened to the rule of law in the State of Texas? We have held nearly 100 open carry walks across the state in areas both crowded and sparse, small towns and large cities. Police officers do not write the law, they enforce it. There is serious abuse of authority issue when a senior law enforcement officer like Sergeant McGuire can spout things like, “It is not illegal to walk around with a loaded 30-30 rifle. If however someone is alarmed by someone doing so, the police may take action under Disorderly Conduct laws in Texas.” Then to go on and say, “The right to bear arms is important to all of us, but to walk around in a crowded commercial area just because you can is unwise and could get folks in trouble.”

Why is that? Why is it that police officers can walk round with openly carried firearms and people don’t freak out, but when a private citizen – the masters of every police officer – does the same thing, it’s up to interpretation on whether it’s “wise” or not?

The following image does not come with citations, so it’s not shared as any sort of factual smoking gun on the issue. For good reason I’m sure, there really isn’t a tracking mechanism or reporting requirement that I’m aware of in the United States that tracks the number of police shootings that injure or kill innocent people and bystanders. However, a look through the Bureau of Justice Statistics site reveals a wealth of information that seems to at least support the contention of this graphic.


ABC News recently did a story on the alarming rise in shootings at the hands of police officers that focused on whether they are even properly trained. We give police officers wide latitude in their jobs and they are typically untouchable in court. When it comes down to a citizen’s word against an officer’s word in court, the citizen doesn’t stand a chance. Sir Robert Peel, credited with being the father of the modern police force, created nine principles of policing.

1. The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.

2. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.

3. Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.

4. The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.

5. Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.

6. Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient.

7. Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.

8. Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.

9. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.

It would seem to me that the Fort Worth Police Department has forgotten many of these principles, if not, completely turned their back on them.

If, in the eyes of the Ft. Worth Police Department, a mere statement is all that is needed to meet the letter of the law in PC 42.01, then I submit a statement to the contrary that our actions are not “calculated to cause alarm.” Since I know my intent better than someone else does, my statement should trump theirs.

OCT was founded to educate the public that the presence of a firearm is NOT something to be feared. We want to teach people they should feel safe seeing an armed populace. They don’t freak out when a gaggle of police officer walks by with loaded pistols on their belts, they shouldn’t fear their fellow citizen either.

The fact is that mass shootings over the past 60 years have NOT increased as the media, politicians and the Ft. Worth Police Department would have you believe. The only thing that’s changed is the incessant focus on these isolated events in the media. Then the federal and state gun grabbers work feverishly to use these incidents to push their agendas. They stigmatize guns to the point that you can even eat a PopTart a certain way without getting into trouble. There is an epidemic of police violence in this country and, yet, legal gun owners are the ones being castigated. Texas ranks 4th in the number of police-involved shootings with only Florida, Illinois and California having more such shootings.
And yet, we only have a firearm murder rate of 2.91 per 100,000.

All these facts tend to support the graphic above and also blow a major hole in the narrative being dictated by the FWPD.

Texans need to speak up and put our law enforcement officers that disobey their oaths and violate state laws when they say things like this: “A common sense person would not want to walk around in a public place with a rifle or shot gun as the Police will be called I am sure. The only charge someone could be arrested for just walking around with the rifle is a Disorderly Conduct violation listed below.”

Sergeant McGuire doesn’t think that people that exercise their rights according to Texas law have any common sense based on this statement. Who knew that in the land of the free you could be arrested and charged for just walking around with a rifle, which is perfectly legal? Maybe I need to remind Sergeant Keith McGuire and the rest of the Fort Worth Police Department about another section of the law, PC 39.03:

Sec. 39.03. OFFICIAL OPPRESSION. (a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; or
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment.
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.
(c) In this section, “sexual harassment” means unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person’s exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

OCT will not hesitate to file both state criminal charges and federal civil rights charges if they violate their oaths and the law by acting in a manner in which Sergeant McGuire advocates in his communications with us.

I have left numerous emails and phone call messages with Chief Jeffrey W. Halstead and have not received a single response. Please check out our Facebook page for our open carry event happening in Fort Worth this Saturday. We hope to see you there.


10 thoughts on “Ft. Worth PD Willing to Violate Your Right To Carry

  1. james

    The Supreme Court has not at this time issued a ruling on the right to keep and bear arms off of your own property, only that you have a right to keep and bear arms. So each location, ie, city, county, state will have to determine that, The Attorney General of the State of Texas will have to rule on the disorderly conduct statute and what alarmed means if you get this added. The court has ruled that there can be restrictions on your right to keep and bear arms, so far the AG has not issued an opinion on open carry for Texans.

  2. Penny Haulman

    A firearm cannot be discharged on a public road. #7 is incorrect. Its 1000 ft from a public road a firearm can be discharged. When cops, or anyone else, removes themselves from obeying the same law we the people are made to, their organization has become an organization of Satan. Doesn’t matter what is is, like politicians, doctors, cops, rule makers,,,they all make live things dead…

  3. Al

    Please don’t consider McGuire any kind of representative for the police department or any reasonably intelligent officer.

  4. Matt Begley

    I just read an article about how 40 of you wanna be tough guys waited outside a restaurant with all your assault rifles for 4 unarmed peaceful women who just want their children to be safe from retards like you. Real men don’t do such things, of course I don’t imagine that there is even one real man among your group of mentally retarded bullies. Those 40 assholes should have been arrested and had their guns, all of their guns, confiscated and their right to own firearms revoked. It is illegal to intimidate anyone with a gun you morons. Anyone who behaves in such a an un-American and cowardly manner, 40 armed psychos trying to scare 4 unarmed women, does not deserve to live in America and you should all turn your guns on yourselves and do the world a favor. Terrorist pussies!

      1. david

        I just watched the video of the men being illegally arrested for carrying his pre 1899 gun. I need to let you know I am looking for a group to join with to fight for our right to carry any firearm any place any way we chose. After watching this video there is no way I could ever join you in this fight. I was very disgusted with the disrespect and vulger language that was used. I heard someone keep yelling read the law. Maybe he should read 42.01[a][1].
        This is not how you win support, your people are making all gun owners look bad. I do agree the dps broke the law but your group also broke the law by yelling vulgarities in public, so I am asking you as a firearm carrying citizen, until your group can act respectfully don’t plan any more protest you are just making it harder for people to believe an armed people is a polite people.

      2. OCTexas Post author

        We don’t need you David. As long as law enforcement violate the law and our rights they don’t deserve respect. If you feel otherwise, start your own group. We are respectful to officers that respect the people they serve. Period.

  5. neo

    I don’t understand why you took down your 11/16 “apology and offer” to the Mother’s group.
    I’ll admit I was pretty hard on you guys, but I linked to that article
    and even commented on my site, that you deserved credit for that gesture.
    I had to remove it when you removed your entry.
    You were going in the right direction … what happened?

  6. neo

    “Grisham convicted”
    It appears as though the Democratic process has taken its course.
    The only thing you have now are sour grapes and lame excuses.
    Time to grow up boys.
    I share your animosity for crooks, but I choose to do something about it …
    you choose to parade around like impotent peacocks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s